That said, I mean no disrespect to the Jesus of the New Testament, the historical Jesus, or any other kind of Jesus people might imagine or reconstruct when I use that term.
Moreover, the use of "JFC" is meant to create a stark contrast with the sensible, highly moral message of the Gospels, or, at the very least, the "core" message of the Gospels (before revisions centuries after Jesus lived) as reconstructed in the lost sayings gospel Q or other texts.
Is the desire to make money in the Arctic after it melts down compatible with any part of the message of any conception of Jesus you care to use? Absolutely not.
So anybody who is offended by my use of "JFC" should consider these remarks.
If, after reading them, you are still offended, you can kiss my ass.
— Dave
Deeply offended!
Uh, with or without tongue?
Posted by: Reed | 03/09/2013 at 12:04 PM